ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

بازاندیشی در پژوهش کیفی×معیارهای اعتبارپذیری در پژوهش کیفی×
حوزهپژوهش کیفیپژوهش کیفی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش19901985
پدیدآورAnthony Giddens and Pierre BourdieuYvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba
نوعConceptFramework
منبع بنیادینFinlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. DOI ↗Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314
نام‌های دیگرreflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practicetrustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmability
مرتبط44
خلاصهReflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted.Trustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 4 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Reflexivity in Qualitative Research · Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-19 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare