مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| آزمونهای پلاسیبو برای استنتاج علی× | طرح ناپیوستگی تفاضلی× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه | استنتاج علّی | استنتاج علّی |
| خانواده | Regression model | Regression model |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 2010 | 2016 |
| پدیدآور≠ | Abadie, Diamond & Hainmueller (synthetic control placebos); Imbens & Lemieux (RDD validity) | Grembi, Nannicini & Troiano |
| نوع≠ | Falsification / robustness test family for causal inference | Hybrid quasi-experimental causal design (RDD + DID) |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. DOI ↗ | Grembi, V., Nannicini, T. & Troiano, U. (2016). Do Fiscal Rules Matter? A Difference-in-Discontinuities Design. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(3), 1-30. DOI ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر≠ | falsification tests, placebo checks, refutation tests, Plasebo Testleri — Nedensel Çıkarım Doğrulama | diff-in-disc, DiD-RDD, Süreksizliklerde Fark (Difference-in-Discontinuities) |
| مرتبط | 5 | 5 |
| خلاصه≠ | Placebo tests are a family of falsification checks that probe the credibility of a causal claim by re-running the analysis on a fake treatment, a false intervention date, or an outcome that should not have been affected. The approach was popularised through the synthetic control work of Abadie, Diamond and Hainmueller (2010) and the regression-discontinuity validity checks of Imbens and Lemieux (2008). | Difference-in-Discontinuities is a hybrid quasi-experimental design that fuses regression discontinuity (RDD) with difference-in-differences (DID), introduced by Grembi, Nannicini and Troiano (2016). It compares the discontinuity at the same cutoff value across two periods to isolate a causal effect. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|