ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

تعمیم احتمالی مردد TOPSIS×وزن‌دهی عینی همبستگی معیار و انحراف معیار×
حوزهتصمیم‌گیریتصمیم‌گیری
خانوادهMCDMMCDM
سال پیدایش2010
پدیدآورPENDING_LITERATURE_SEARCHWang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
نوعProbabilistic Hesitant outranking/ranking — Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Element (PHFE: {γ|p} pairs)Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
منبع بنیادینPENDING_LITERATURE_SEARCH (). PENDING — PHF-TOPSIS specific seminal not confirmed. Zhang et al. 2017 (doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.001) is the foundational PHFS paper, not a PHF-TOPSIS paper. L.formulation.en cites 'Zhu & Xu 2018' as PHF-TOPSIS anchor — unverified. Candidate from search: Naeem et al. 2021 'Extended TOPSIS method based on the entropy measure and probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information' (JIFS, doi:10.3233/JIFS-202700) — not confirmed as the canonical seminal.. link ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگر
مرتبط88
خلاصهPHF-TOPSIS (Probabilistic Hesitant extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by PENDING_LITERATURE_SEARCH. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 1 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: PHF-TOPSIS · CCSD. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-17 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare