ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

تحلیل استعاری چند موردی×Thematic Analysis×
حوزهکیفیپژوهش کیفی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research)2006
پدیدآورBuilding on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logicVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
نوعQualitative comparative designMethod
منبع بنیادینLakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرcross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMATA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
مرتبط63
خلاصهMultiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Multiple Case-Based Metaphor Analysis · Thematic Analysis. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-17 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare