ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

کارآزمایی بالینی فاز III تطبیقی×تطابق امتیاز تمایل (Propensity Score Matching)×
حوزهاپیدمیولوژیآمار پژوهش
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایشMid-20th century (matching in RCTs formalized ~1950s–1970s)1983
پدیدآورFisher, R. A. (matching principles); adapted into confirmatory trial design over mid-20th centuryPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
نوعControlled confirmatory clinical trial with matchingMethod
منبع بنیادینRothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرmatched controlled Phase III trial, Phase III matched-pair trial, matched confirmatory trial, matched late-phase RCTPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
مرتبط53
خلاصهA matched Phase III clinical trial is a confirmatory, late-stage controlled study in which each participant assigned to the experimental treatment is paired with one or more controls who share key prognostic characteristics — such as age, disease stage, or comorbidities — before treatment allocation. By ensuring baseline comparability at the level of matched pairs, the design reduces confounding and improves statistical efficiency in settings where simple randomization alone may produce imbalanced groups or where full randomization is logistically or ethically constrained.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Matched Phase III Clinical Trial · Propensity Score Matching. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-19 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare