ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

تخمین‌گر تطبیق تقویت‌شده با یادگیری ماشین×تطابق امتیاز تمایل (Propensity Score Matching)×
حوزهاستنتاج علّیآمار پژوهش
خانوادهRegression modelProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش2006–20181983
پدیدآورAbadie & Imbens (classical matching); Chernozhukov et al. (ML augmentation framework)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
نوعCausal inference / nonparametric matchingMethod
منبع بنیادینChernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرML-augmented matching, ML matching estimator, high-dimensional matching estimator, data-adaptive matching estimatorPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
مرتبط53
خلاصهThe machine learning-augmented matching estimator combines classical nearest-neighbor or propensity-score matching with ML algorithms — such as lasso, random forests, or gradient boosting — to select covariates, estimate propensity scores, and correct for residual bias. The result is a matching-based causal estimator that remains valid under high-dimensional confounding where traditional hand-specified matching fails.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Machine Learning-Augmented Matching Estimator · Propensity Score Matching. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-17 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare