ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

سرقت فکری و سرقت مفهوم×سرقت ادبی موزاییکی×
حوزهاخلاق پژوهشاخلاق پژوهش
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش1980s1990s
پدیدآورAcademic integrity framework (modern definition)Academic integrity framework (modern definition)
نوعConceptConcept
منبع بنیادینHirsch, L. R. (2013). Recognizing plagiarism: A guide for academic professionals. Teaching Professor Blog. link ↗Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. link ↗
نام‌های دیگرconceptual plagiarism, idea theft, intellectual theftpatch-writing, patchwork plagiarism, incremental plagiarism
مرتبط34
خلاصهIdea plagiarism, or conceptual plagiarism, occurs when an author takes another's ideas, arguments, theories, or conceptual frameworks and presents them as original work without crediting the source. Unlike verbatim or paraphrasing plagiarism (which involve copying language), idea plagiarism involves taking the intellectual content itself—the argument, theory, or framework—regardless of how it is worded. It is the hardest form of plagiarism to detect because it does not require word-for-word copying.Mosaic plagiarism, also called patch-writing, occurs when an author mixes copied phrases and sentences from a source with original text, rearranges material from multiple sources, or interweaves paraphrased and verbatim passages without proper citation or quotation marks. It is difficult to detect because the copied portions are interspersed with original writing, creating a surface appearance of original work.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Idea Plagiarism and Concept Theft · Mosaic Plagiarism. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-19 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare