مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| ارزیابی میدانی برنامهها× | پژوهش عملی آموزشی× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه | روشهای میدانی | روشهای میدانی |
| خانواده | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 1970s–1980s (field methods integration with evaluation practice) | 1940s (Lewin); educational context developed 1970s–1980s |
| پدیدآور≠ | Michael Q. Patton; Peter H. Rossi and Howard E. Freeman | Kurt Lewin (action research foundations); Lawrence Stenhouse and John Elliott (educational adaptation) |
| نوع≠ | Applied evaluation research | Participatory qualitative research design |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761908944 | Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Open University Press. ISBN: 978-0335096190 |
| نامهای دیگر | naturalistic program evaluation, field evaluation, on-site program evaluation, field-based evaluation | EAR, practitioner research, teacher action research, classroom action research |
| مرتبط | 6 | 6 |
| خلاصه≠ | Field-based program evaluation is an applied research method that assesses the implementation, outcomes, and value of a program by collecting data directly in the natural setting where the program operates. Rather than relying solely on administrative records or remote surveys, evaluators embed themselves in the field — observing activities, interviewing stakeholders on-site, and reviewing context-specific documents — to produce evidence-grounded judgments about program merit and worth. | Educational action research is a cyclical, practitioner-led inquiry method in which educators systematically investigate a problem or opportunity in their own classroom or school, implement a change, observe its effects, and reflect on findings to guide the next cycle. Rooted in Kurt Lewin's action research framework and developed for educational contexts by Lawrence Stenhouse and John Elliott, it bridges the gap between educational theory and classroom practice by making teachers agents of rigorous inquiry. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|