ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

تحلیل گفتمان مبتنی بر میدان×Thematic Analysis×
حوزهکیفیپژوهش کیفی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش1980s–1990s2006
پدیدآورSynthesised from Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and discourse analysis; systematised by researchers including John FrowVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
نوعQualitative analytical frameworkMethod
منبع بنیادینBourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510302Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرfield discourse analysis, Bourdieusian discourse analysis, sociological discourse analysis, FDATA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
مرتبط63
خلاصهField-based discourse analysis integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — a structured social space of positions, capital, and struggle — with the close textual methods of discourse analysis. Rather than treating language as a neutral medium, it examines how discourse is produced, circulated, and received within specific social fields (education, law, journalism, science, etc.), and how discursive choices reflect and reproduce the distribution of power and capital within those fields.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Field-based Discourse Analysis · Thematic Analysis. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-17 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare