ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

ماتریس سردرگمی×دقت×ضریب همبستگی متیوز (MCC)×بازیابی (حساسیت)×
حوزهارزیابی مدلارزیابی مدلارزیابی مدلارزیابی مدل
خانوادهMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDM
سال پیدایش20th century20th century197520th century
پدیدآورStatistical foundationsHistorical statistical foundationsBrian W. MatthewsHistorical statistical foundations
نوعEvaluation visualizationEvaluation metricEvaluation metricEvaluation metric
منبع بنیادینEveritt, B. S., & Hothorn, T. (2005). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. link ↗Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗Matthews, B. W. (1975). Comparison of predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein Structure, 405(2), 442-451. DOI ↗Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرError Matrix, Contingency TableOverall Accuracy, Correct Classification RatePhi Coefficient, Binary Classification CorrelationSensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPR
مرتبط5555
خلاصهThe confusion matrix is a table that displays the counts of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. It provides a complete picture of where a classifier makes correct and incorrect predictions, enabling calculation of all other classification metrics.Accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions among the total number of predictions made by a classification model. It is the most intuitive performance metric and measures how often the classifier makes correct predictions overall, regardless of class.The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) is a correlation measure between predicted and actual binary classifications. It ranges from -1 to 1 and is considered one of the most reliable single-score metrics for evaluating binary classifiers, especially on imbalanced datasets.Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Confusion Matrix · Accuracy · Matthews Correlation Coefficient · Recall (Sensitivity). بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-18 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare