ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

طرح بیزی پس‌رو (Ex Post Facto)×تطابق امتیاز تمایل (Propensity Score Matching)×
حوزهطراحی پژوهشآمار پژوهش
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش1964 (Kerlinger ex post facto); Bayesian integration from 1990s–2000s onward1983
پدیدآورFrederick N. Kerlinger (ex post facto framework); Bayesian extension draws on Laplace and modern Bayesian statisticsPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
نوعQuantitative observational research design with Bayesian inferenceMethod
منبع بنیادینKerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. link ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرBayesian causal-comparative design, Bayesian after-the-fact design, Bayesian observational causal design, Bayesian retrospective causal studyPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
مرتبط53
خلاصهBayesian ex post facto design investigates possible causal relationships among variables that have already occurred, without researcher manipulation of those variables, and quantifies uncertainty about those relationships using Bayesian statistical inference. The researcher selects groups that differ on an outcome or a presumed cause after the fact, then uses prior knowledge and observed data together — via Bayes' theorem — to estimate credible effect sizes, group differences, or predictors.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Bayesian Ex Post Facto Design · Propensity Score Matching. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-18 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare