Elite Cue Experiment
An elite cue experiment isolates the persuasive power of source endorsements by holding a policy message constant and randomly varying who is said to support it. Grounded in John Zaller's receive-accept-sample model of mass opinion, which holds that citizens take cues from trusted political elites rather than reasoning from first principles, the design reveals how much opinion moves simply because a party or leader takes a side. Stephen Nicholson's work on polarizing cues shows that in-party endorsements can persuade while out-party endorsements provoke backlash, making the cue, not the argument, the engine of opinion change.
Loe meetodi täielikku kirjeldust
Selle osa lugemiseks logi sisse tasuta kontoga.
Meetodikaart
Seotud meetodite ümbruskond — vali sõlm, et seda uurida.
Allikad
- Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521407861
- Nicholson, S. P. (2012). Polarizing Cues. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 52-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00541.x ↗
Kuidas sellele lehele viidata
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Elite Cue Experiment (Party-Endorsement Persuasion Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/et/political-psychology/elite-cue-experiment
Milline meetod?
Aseta see meetod oma lähimate sugulaste kõrvale ja loe neid kõrvuti — raamatukogu laob raamatud lauale; valik on sinu.
- Democratic Norms Support MeasurementPoliitiline psühholoogia↔ võrdle
- Issue Framing ExperimentPoliitiline psühholoogia↔ võrdle
- Partisan Motivated Reasoning ParadigmPoliitiline psühholoogia↔ võrdle
Sellele viitavad
Sarnased meetodid
Märkasid sellel lehel viga? Teata sellest või paku parandust →