Democratic Norms Support Measurement
This approach measures how committed ordinary citizens are to democratic norms by observing the price they are willing to pay to uphold them. Rather than asking abstractly whether people value democracy, Matthew Graham and Milan Svolik's 2020 candidate-choice design confronts voters with a co-partisan candidate who violates a democratic principle and estimates how much electoral support that violation costs. Their finding that most Americans will tolerate undemocratic behavior by their own side when partisanship and policy stakes are high reframed the study of democratic backsliding around revealed, not professed, commitment. Christopher Claassen's parallel work links aggregate diffuse support for democracy to whether democracies survive.
Loe meetodi täielikku kirjeldust
Selle osa lugemiseks logi sisse tasuta kontoga.
Meetodikaart
Seotud meetodite ümbruskond — vali sõlm, et seda uurida.
Allikad
- Graham, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392-409. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055420000052 ↗
- Claassen, C. (2020). Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive? American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 118-134. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12452 ↗
Kuidas sellele lehele viidata
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Measuring Mass Support for Democratic Norms (Candidate-Choice Tradeoff Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/et/political-psychology/democratic-norms-support-scale
Milline meetod?
Aseta see meetod oma lähimate sugulaste kõrvale ja loe neid kõrvuti — raamatukogu laob raamatud lauale; valik on sinu.
- Elite Cue ExperimentPoliitiline psühholoogia↔ võrdle
- Poliitilise usalduse skaalaPoliitiline psühholoogia↔ võrdle
- Support for Political Violence MeasurePoliitiline psühholoogia↔ võrdle
Sellele viitavad
Sarnased meetodid
Märkasid sellel lehel viga? Teata sellest või paku parandust →