ScholarGate
Assistent
MCDMRetrospective / accountability voting theory

Economic Voting Analysis

Economic voting analysis is the formal study of how voters reward or punish incumbents according to economic performance. In the reward-punishment (retrospective) model pioneered by Gerald Kramer in 1971, support for the governing party is a function of recent economic outcomes — growth, unemployment, and inflation — so that good times re-elect incumbents and bad times turn them out. Michael Lewis-Beck and Mary Stegmaier's 2000 review consolidated the field, establishing that economic voting is predominantly sociotropic (based on the national economy rather than personal finances) and that its strength depends on the clarity of responsibility: how easily voters can attribute outcomes to the incumbent.

Ava rakenduses MethodMindPeagiRakenda, võrdle, saa juhiseid
Tööriistad ja ressursid
Laadi slaidid alla
Õpi ja avasta
VideoPeagi

Loe meetodi täielikku kirjeldust

Ainult liikmetele

Selle osa lugemiseks logi sisse tasuta kontoga.

Logi sisse

Meetodikaart

Seotud meetodite ümbruskond — vali sõlm, et seda uurida.

Allikad

  1. Kramer, G. H. (1971). Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896-1964. American Political Science Review, 65(1), 131-143. DOI: 10.2307/1955049
  2. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2000). Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 183-219. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.183

Kuidas sellele lehele viidata

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Economic Voting Model (Retrospective and Reward-Punishment). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/et/political-economy/economic-voting-analysis

Milline meetod?

Aseta see meetod oma lähimate sugulaste kõrvale ja loe neid kõrvuti — raamatukogu laob raamatud lauale; valik on sinu.

Võrdle kõrvuti

Sellele viitavad

ScholarGateEconomic Voting Analysis (Economic Voting Model (Retrospective and Reward-Punishment)). Loetud 2026-06-25 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/political-economy/economic-voting-analysis · Andmestik: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026