Meetodi tõendite kirje

Democratic Norms Support Measurement

This approach measures how committed ordinary citizens are to democratic norms by observing the price they are willing to pay to uphold them. Rather than asking abstractly whether people value democracy, Matthew Graham and Milan Svolik's 2020 candidate-choice design confronts voters with a co-partisan candidate who violates a democratic principle and estimates how much electoral support that violation costs. Their finding that most Americans will tolerate undemocratic behavior by their own side when partisanship and policy stakes are high reframed the study of democratic backsliding around revealed, not professed, commitment. Christopher Claassen's parallel work links aggregate diffuse support for democracy to whether democracies survive.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Allikakirje

Tsiteeringud kopeeritud meetodi allikakirjest sõna-sõnalt. Nendest ei saa järeldada väidete tasemel kinnitust.

Measuring Mass Support for Democratic Norms (Candidate-Choice Tradeoff Design)

Taksonoomiline meetodikirje · process-pipeline / political-psychology

Ava täielik meetod

Kureeritud väited

Väited on salvestatud tõendite registrisse, igal oma hinnanguga.

Kureeritud väiteid veel pole

See vaade ei loo väite hinnangut, kui registris seda pole.

Seotud meetodid

Genereeritud meetodigraafist ja kuvatud masina soovitatud seostena – väiteid ei järeldata.

Same method familyElite Cue Experimentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPolitical Trust Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainSupport for Political Violence Measuremachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.