ScholarGate
Assistent

Võrdle meetodeid

Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.

Wordfish Scaling×Manifesto Coding×Wordfish×Wordscores×
ValdkondPolitical SciencePolitical SciencePsühhomeetriaPsühhomeetria
PerekondLatent structureProcess / pipelineLatent structureLatent structure
Tekkeaasta2008200120082003
LoojaJonathan Slapin and Sven-Oliver ProkschManifesto Research Group / Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP/MARPOR)Jonathan Slapin, Svenja-Sophia ProkschMichael Laver, Kenneth Benoit, John Garry
TüüpUnsupervised latent-position model for word-count dataQuantitative content analysis of party manifestosGenerative text model for dimension reductionText analysis and dimension reduction
AlgallikasSlapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. DOI ↗Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., & Tanenbaum, E. (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199244003Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S. O. (2008). A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. Journal of Politics, 70(3), 554-569. DOI ↗Laver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311-331. DOI ↗
RööpnimetusedWordfish text scaling, Poisson scaling of texts, Unsupervised text scaling, Wordfish position estimationCMP coding, MARPOR coding, Manifesto content analysis, Party manifesto coding
Seotud4455
KokkuvõteWordfish scaling is an unsupervised text-as-data method that estimates a single latent position for each political document — a party manifesto, a legislative speech, a press release — directly from its word frequencies, without any reference texts or hand coding. Introduced by Slapin and Proksch in 2008, it models word counts as draws from a Poisson distribution whose rate depends on a document position and word-specific parameters, recovering, for example, a left–right ordering of parties purely from how often each word appears in each text.Manifesto coding is the quantitative content-analysis methodology of the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP/MARPOR) for measuring parties' policy preferences from their election manifestos. Trained coders break each manifesto into quasi-sentences and assign every unit to one of a fixed set of policy categories. Counting how often each category appears yields salience measures, and combining pro- and anti- categories produces position scores such as the left–right RILE index, giving comparable estimates of party positions across more than fifty democracies since 1945.Wordfish is a statistical model for scaling documents on latent dimensions, developed by Slapin and Proksch (2008). Unlike reference-based methods like Wordscores, Wordfish uses a Poisson generative model to jointly estimate word frequencies and document positions without requiring reference texts or manual annotation. It is particularly useful for estimating time-series changes in policy positions and can scale documents from multiple languages simultaneously.Wordscores is a text-based scaling method developed by Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003) that estimates the policy positions of political actors based on word frequencies in their texts. By comparing word usage in reference texts of known positions with test texts, the method infers the latent political dimension of any document without requiring manual coding or training data.
ScholarGateAndmestik
  1. v1
  2. 3 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED

Mine otsingusse Laadi slaidid alla

ScholarGateVõrdle meetodeid: Wordfish Scaling · Manifesto Coding · Wordfish · Wordscores. Loetud 2026-06-25 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/compare