Võrdle meetodeid
Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.
| Kaalutud F1× | Mikrokeskmine F1× | |
|---|---|---|
| Valdkond | Mudelite hindamine | Mudelite hindamine |
| Perekond | MCDM | MCDM |
| Tekkeaasta | 2000s | 2000s |
| Looja | Multi-class evaluation community | Multi-class evaluation community |
| Tüüp | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Algallikas | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ |
| Rööpnimetused≠ | Support-weighted F1 | Micro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1 |
| Seotud≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Kokkuvõte≠ | Weighted F1 computes the F1-score for each class and then takes a weighted average, where weights are proportional to the number of samples in each class (support). It provides a middle ground between macro and micro-averaging. | Micro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance. |
| ScholarGateAndmestik ↗ |
|
|