Võrdle meetodeid
Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.
| Heterogeense mõju hinnangu vastumõju hindamine× | Marginaalne strukturaalne mudel (MSM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Valdkond | Põhjuslik järeldamine | Põhjuslik järeldamine |
| Perekond | Regression model | Regression model |
| Tekkeaasta≠ | 2010s | 2000 |
| Looja≠ | Cerulli (2010) for CIE framework; Athey & Wager (2019) for causal forest-based CATE within CIE | James M. Robins, Miguel A. Hernan, Babette Brumback |
| Tüüp≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference with subgroup heterogeneity | Causal model / semiparametric weighting |
| Algallikas≠ | Cerulli, G. (2010). Modelling and measuring the effect of public subsidies on business R&D: A critical review of the econometric literature. Economic Record, 86(274), 421-449. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Rööpnimetused | HTE-CIE, heterogeneous CIE, CATE-based counterfactual evaluation, subgroup counterfactual impact evaluation | MSM, MSM-IPTW, marginal structural Cox model, weighted structural model |
| Seotud≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Kokkuvõte≠ | Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (HTE-CIE) extends standard counterfactual impact evaluation by estimating how the causal effect of a policy or intervention varies across subgroups defined by pre-treatment characteristics. Rather than reporting a single average treatment effect, it maps the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) across the covariate space, revealing who benefits most or least from an intervention. | A marginal structural model is a causal modeling framework designed to estimate the effect of a time-varying treatment in the presence of time-varying confounders that are themselves affected by prior treatment. By reweighting observations with inverse probability of treatment weights, MSMs create a pseudo-population in which confounding is eliminated, enabling unbiased estimation of causal treatment contrasts even when standard regression adjustments would fail. |
| ScholarGateAndmestik ↗ |
|
|