Võrdle meetodeid
Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.
| Põhjuslik mediatsioonianalüüs (looduslikud otsesed ja kaudsed mõjud)× | Kausalidentifitseerimine suunatud atsükliliste graafide abil (do-arvutus)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Valdkond | Põhjuslik järeldamine | Põhjuslik järeldamine |
| Perekond | Regression model | Regression model |
| Tekkeaasta≠ | 2010 | 2009 |
| Looja≠ | Pearl (2001); general framework by Imai, Keele & Tingley (2010) | Judea Pearl |
| Tüüp≠ | Counterfactual causal decomposition | Causal identification framework |
| Algallikas≠ | Pearl, J. (2001). Direct and Indirect Effects. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), 411-420. link ↗ | Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521895606 |
| Rööpnimetused≠ | natural direct effect, natural indirect effect, NDE / NIE decomposition, counterfactual mediation | do-calculus, backdoor adjustment, Pearl causal identification, DAG ile Nedensel Tanımlama (do-calculus) |
| Seotud | 5 | 5 |
| Kokkuvõte≠ | Causal mediation analysis is a counterfactual framework that splits a treatment's total effect into a Natural Direct Effect (NDE) and a Natural Indirect Effect (NIE) that runs through a mediator. The modern general approach was formalised by Pearl (2001) and Imai, Keele and Tingley (2010), giving the decomposition a precise causal interpretation. | DAG causal identification is a framework, developed by Judea Pearl (2009), that encodes causal assumptions as a directed acyclic graph and uses the do-calculus rules to determine whether and how a causal effect can be identified from observational data. It systematically handles confounders, instrumental variables, and backdoor paths. |
| ScholarGateAndmestik ↗ |
|
|