Registro de evidencia del método

Computerized Adaptive Test Convergent Validity

Convergent validity assessment for computerized adaptive tests (CATs) examines whether the ability or trait estimates produced by an adaptive algorithm correlate substantially with scores from other measures of the same construct. Because each examinee receives a different subset of items in a CAT, demonstrating that the resulting scores still converge with theoretically related external measures is a critical step in establishing construct validity evidence.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Registro de origen

Citas copiadas textualmente del registro de origen del método. No se infiere ninguna verificación a nivel de afirmación de ellas.

Convergent Validity Assessment for Computerized Adaptive Tests

Registro del método taxonómico · latent-structure / psychometrics

Wainer, H. (Ed.). (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. · ISBN 978-0805835113
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education / Macmillan. · URL

Abrir método completo

Afirmaciones curadas

Afirmaciones persistidas en el libro mayor de evidencia, cada una con su propia evaluación.

Aún no hay afirmaciones curadas

Esta vista no inventa una evaluación de afirmación si el libro mayor no tiene ninguna.

Métodos relacionados

Generado a partir del grafo de métodos y mostrado como relaciones sugeridas por la máquina; no se infiere ninguna afirmación de evidencia.

Taxonomic bucketComputerized adaptive test construct validitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketComputerized adaptive test item response theorymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketConvergent Validitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketDiscriminant Validitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketItem Response Theorymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.