ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Sistema de Medición No Lineal de Influencia Ponderada×Evaluación de Razón Aditiva×AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation)×
CampoToma de decisionesToma de decisionesToma de decisiones
FamiliaMCDMMCDMMCDM
Año de origen201320102022
Autor originalMichnik, J.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
TipoInfluence network weighting + DEMATEL-style strength scoringAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Fuente seminalMichnik, J. (2013). Weighted Influence Non-linear Gauge System (WINGS) — An analysis method for the systems of interrelated components. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
Alias
Relacionados888
ResumenWINGS (Weighted Influence Non-linear Gauge System) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Michnik, J. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: WINGS · ARAS · AROMAN. Recuperado el 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare