ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Evaluación de Razón Aditiva×AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation)×
CampoToma de decisionesToma de decisiones
FamiliaMCDMMCDM
Año de origen20102022
Autor originalZavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
TipoAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Fuente seminalZavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
Alias
Relacionados88
ResumenARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: ARAS · AROMAN. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare