ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Medidas de riesgo de cola (Expected Shortfall, Espectral, Expectil)×Regresión por Mínimos Cuadrados Ordinarios (MCO)×
CampoFinanzasEconometría
FamiliaRegression modelRegression model
Año de origen19992019
Autor originalArtzner, Delbaen, Eber & Heath (coherent risk axioms); Acerbi & Tasche (Expected Shortfall)Wooldridge (textbook treatment); classical least squares
TipoCoherent tail risk measureLinear regression
Fuente seminalArtzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M. & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent Measures of Risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228. DOI ↗Wooldridge, J. M. (2019). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1337558860
Aliasexpected shortfall, conditional value at risk, CVaR, spectral risk measureordinary least squares, classical linear regression, linear regression, en küçük kareler regresyonu
Relacionados55
ResumenTail risk measures quantify the loss distribution beyond Value-at-Risk (VaR). Expected Shortfall — the expected loss given that VaR is exceeded — is the leading coherent risk measure, formalised by Artzner, Delbaen, Eber and Heath (1999) and shown to be coherent by Acerbi and Tasche (2002). Spectral and expectile-based measures generalise it.Ordinary Least Squares is the classical linear regression method that explains a continuous outcome as a linear combination of predictors. It estimates the coefficients by minimising the sum of squared residuals, and under the Gauss-Markov assumptions these estimates are the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE).
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Tail Risk Measures · OLS Regression. Recuperado el 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare