Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Escala de Integración de la Cadena de Suministro× | Escala de Capacidad de Absorción× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Dirección estratégica | Dirección estratégica |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 2010 | 2002 |
| Autor original≠ | Flynn, Huo, and Zhao | Shaker Zahra and Gerard George |
| Tipo | Organizational self-report questionnaire | Organizational self-report questionnaire |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58–71. DOI ↗ | Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | SCI Scale, Supply Chain Collaboration Scale | ACAP, Zahra-George Scale |
| Relacionados | 5 | 5 |
| Resumen≠ | Supply Chain Integration (SCI) refers to an organization's capacity to seamlessly coordinate and align processes, information, and incentives across internal functions and with external suppliers and customers. Flynn et al. (2010) operationalized SCI into three complementary dimensions in the Journal of Operations Management: internal integration (coordination across departments), supplier integration (collaboration with upstream partners), and customer integration (collaboration with downstream partners). Organizations with high SCI reduce costs through process alignment, improve quality through shared information, and accelerate time-to-market through coordinated innovation. This scale has become foundational in supply chain management research and practice. | Absorptive Capacity (ACAP) refers to an organization's ability to acquire, assimilate, transform, and exploit external knowledge to enhance innovation and performance. Zahra and George (2002) reconceptualized absorptive capacity into four distinct but interrelated processes in their foundational Academy of Management Review article. This measurement scale captures organizational learning dynamics and knowledge-based competitive advantage, making it essential for assessing innovation capability and knowledge management effectiveness. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|