Comparar métodos

	Especificidad	Puntuación F1	Coeficiente de Correlación de Matthews
Campo	Evaluación de modelos	Evaluación de modelos	Evaluación de modelos
Familia	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Año de origen	20th century	1979	1975
Autor original	Historical statistical foundations	C. J. van Rijsbergen	Brian W. Matthews
Tipo	Evaluation metric	Evaluation metric	Evaluation metric
Fuente seminal	Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874.	van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information Retrieval (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.	Matthews, B. W. (1975). Comparison of predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein Structure, 405(2), 442-451.
Alias	True Negative Rate, TNR	F-measure, Harmonic Mean	Phi Coefficient, Binary Classification Correlation
Relacionados	5	5	5
Resumen	Specificity measures the proportion of actual negative cases that were correctly identified as negative by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly negative, how many did we correctly reject?' Specificity is complementary to recall and is essential when false positives are costly.	The F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a single metric that balances both concerns. It was introduced by van Rijsbergen in information retrieval and has become a standard metric for evaluating classification models where both precision and recall are important.	The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) is a correlation measure between predicted and actual binary classifications. It ranges from -1 to 1 and is considered one of the most reliable single-score metrics for evaluating binary classifiers, especially on imbalanced datasets.