Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Ponderación Espacial por Puntaje de Propensión× | Ponderación por Puntuación de Propensión (PSW / IPW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Inferencia causal | Inferencia causal |
| Familia | Regression model | Regression model |
| Año de origen≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator) |
| Autor original≠ | Extended from Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003) IPTW with spatial adaptations by Keele, Titiunik and others in geographically structured causal designs | Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting) |
| Tipo≠ | Quasi-experimental / causal inference | Causal inference / reweighting |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Keele, L., & Titiunik, R. (2015). Geographic Boundaries as Regression Discontinuities. Political Analysis, 23(1), 127-155. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | spatial PSW, geographically weighted propensity score weighting, spatial IPTW, spatially adjusted inverse probability weighting | PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | Spatial propensity score weighting extends inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to settings where units are geographically located and treatment assignment may depend on spatial factors such as location, neighborhood characteristics, or spatial clustering. By incorporating spatial covariates into the propensity score model and adjusting standard errors for spatial autocorrelation, it produces more credible causal estimates from observational geographic data. | Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003). |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|