Comparar métodos

	Self-Paced Reading Task	Acceptability Judgment Task
Campo	Lingüística	Lingüística
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	1982	1996
Autor original	Marcel Just, Patricia Carpenter, and Jacqueline Woolley	Experimental-syntax researchers (Jon Sprouse; Ellen Bard, Antonella Sorace)
Tipo	Online measure of sentence-processing difficulty	Quantified rating of sentence well-formedness
Fuente seminal	Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228–238.	Sprouse, J., Schütze, C. T., & Almeida, D. (2013). A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua, 134, 219–248.
Alias	Self-Paced Reading, Moving-Window Reading, SPR, Word-by-Word Reading Task	Acceptability Judgement Task, AJT, Sentence Acceptability Rating, Experimental Syntax Judgment Task
Relacionados	3	3
Resumen	The self-paced reading task — Just, Carpenter, and Woolley's moving-window paradigm — measures sentence comprehension as it unfolds. Participants read a sentence one word (or phrase) at a time, pressing a button to reveal each segment and hide the previous one, and the software logs how long each segment stays on screen. Those per-region reading times index processing difficulty: when the parser stumbles — at a garden-path disambiguation, an unexpected word, or a long-distance dependency — reading slows, and the slowdown localizes the difficulty to a specific region of the sentence. It is one of the simplest and most widely used online measures in psycholinguistics.	The acceptability judgment task is the modern, quantified successor to informal grammaticality judgments: instead of a single linguist marking a sentence grammatical or not, many participants rate carefully controlled sentences on a graded scale, and the ratings are analyzed statistically. Built on factorial designs with fillers and counterbalancing, and on response formats from Likert scales to magnitude estimation to forced choice, it turns intuition into replicable, gradient data. The approach anchors the experimental-syntax program associated with Jon Sprouse and colleagues, which tests grammatical hypotheses with the same methodological rigor as psycholinguistic experiments.