ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Emparejamiento Robusto por Puntuación de Propensión×Ponderación por Puntuación de Propensión (PSW / IPW)×
CampoInferencia causalInferencia causal
FamiliaRegression modelRegression model
Año de origen2016 (robust variance correction); 1983 (PSM foundations)1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Autor originalAbadie & Imbens (2016) for matching-on-estimated-propensity-score with corrected variance; Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) for PSM foundationsRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TipoQuasi-experimental matching estimator with robust inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
Fuente seminalAbadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2016). Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781-807. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Aliasrobust PSM, PSM with robust variance, bias-corrected PSM, matching with robust inferencePSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Relacionados66
ResumenRobust Propensity Score Matching (robust PSM) is a quasi-experimental causal inference method that pairs treated and control units on their estimated probability of receiving treatment (the propensity score), then estimates the average treatment effect using variance estimators that account for the uncertainty introduced by estimating the propensity score itself. The correction, developed by Abadie and Imbens (2016), prevents misleading inference that standard bootstrap or analytic formulas produce when applied naively after matching.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Robust Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare