ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Estudios de Evidencia del Mundo Real×Diseño de estudio de cohortes×
CampoInvestigación clínicaInvestigación clínica
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origen2010s-present1970s-1980s
Autor originalFDA, EMA, and health agencies; Sherman et al. (2016) defined RWE formallyDonald Acheson, Olli Miettinen, and others in modern epidemiology
TipoResearch DesignResearch Design
Fuente seminalSherman, R. E., Anderson, S. A., Dal Pan, G. J., Gray, G. W., Gross, T., Hunter, N. L., ... & Califf, R. M. (2016). Real-world evidence—what is it and what can it tell us? New England Journal of Medicine, 375(23), 2293–2297. DOI ↗Miettinen, O. S. (1976). Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 103(2), 226–235. DOI ↗
Aliasreal-world evidence, RWE, RWD, effectiveness researchprospective study, follow-up study, longitudinal study, cohort study
Relacionados32
ResumenReal-World Evidence (RWE) is clinical evidence derived from Real-World Data (RWD)—data routinely collected in clinical practice from electronic health records, insurance claims, patient registries, and other healthcare sources. Formalized by the FDA in 2016 (Sherman et al.), RWE addresses a critical gap: while randomized trials test drugs under ideal conditions, RWE evaluates how treatments actually work in diverse, real patients with comorbidities, competing medications, and varied adherence. RWE complements (not replaces) trial evidence, accelerating regulatory decision-making and supporting post-market surveillance.A cohort study follows a group of individuals forward in time from exposure to outcome. Exposed and unexposed participants (or participants with differing exposure levels) are enrolled at baseline, characterized, and observed prospectively until the outcome occurs or the study ends. Cohort studies are fundamental to epidemiology and are the design of choice for establishing causal associations when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Real-World Evidence Studies · Cohort Study Design. Recuperado el 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare