ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Detección de Propaganda×Clasificación de Texto×
CampoMinería de textoMinería de texto
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origen
Autor original
TipoNLP text-classification taskSupervised NLP classification task
Fuente seminalDa San Martino, G. et al. (2019). Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articles. EMNLP. DOI ↗Joachims, T. (1998). Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features. ECML 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1398. Springer. DOI ↗
Aliaspropaganda and manipulation detection, propaganda technique detection, Propaganda ve Manipülasyon Tespititext categorization, document classification, topic classification, metin sınıflandırma
Relacionados44
ResumenPropaganda detection is a natural-language-processing task that automatically identifies and labels persuasion and manipulation techniques in text — such as loaded language, oversimplified solutions, bandwagon appeals, and glittering generalities. It builds on the fine-grained propaganda analysis introduced by Da San Martino et al. (2019), turning rhetorical manipulation into structured, technique-level labels.Text classification, also called text categorization, is a supervised natural-language-processing task that automatically assigns documents to predefined categories. Building on the support-vector-machine approach to text categorization established by Joachims (1998) and consolidated in the text-mining literature by Aggarwal and Zhai (2012), it powers tasks such as spam detection and topic classification by learning from labelled examples.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Propaganda Detection · Text Classification. Recuperado el 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare