Comparar métodos

	Estimador de emparejamiento para la evaluación de políticas	Método de Variables Instrumentales (VI) para Inferencia Causal
Campo	Inferencia causal	Economía de la salud
Familia	Regression model	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	1998-2006	1990s (modern applications)
Autor original	Heckman, Ichimura & Todd; Abadie & Imbens	Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory
Tipo	Non-parametric causal estimator	Method
Fuente seminal	Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235-267.	Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Alias	matching estimator, program evaluation matching, treatment effect matching, Abadie-Imbens estimator	IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation
Relacionados	6	3
Resumen	The policy evaluation matching estimator estimates the causal effect of a program or policy on treated units by pairing each participant with one or more non-participants who share similar pre-treatment characteristics. Developed rigorously by Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1998) and Abadie & Imbens (2006), it avoids parametric outcome models and is the standard non-parametric tool for program and policy evaluation.	Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes.