Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| F1-score promediado por microclase× | Exactitud× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Evaluación de modelos | Evaluación de modelos |
| Familia | MCDM | MCDM |
| Año de origen≠ | 2000s | 20th century |
| Autor original≠ | Multi-class evaluation community | Historical statistical foundations |
| Tipo | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | Micro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1 | Overall Accuracy, Correct Classification Rate |
| Relacionados≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Resumen≠ | Micro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance. | Accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions among the total number of predictions made by a classification model. It is the most intuitive performance metric and measures how often the classifier makes correct predictions overall, regardless of class. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|