ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Riesgos Proporcionales de Cox Emparejados×Estudio de cohortes emparejadas×
CampoEpidemiologíaEpidemiología
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origen1972 (Cox model); matched extension widely adopted 1970s–1980sMid-20th century; propensity-score variant 1983
Autor originalD. R. Cox (Cox model, 1972); stratification extension for matched designs by subsequent methodologists including D. C. ThomasEstablished practice; propensity-score matching formalized by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)
TipoSemi-parametric survival regression for matched dataObservational analytic study design
Fuente seminalCox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
Aliasstratified Cox regression, conditional Cox model, matched survival analysis, Cox model for matched pairsmatched follow-up study, paired cohort study, propensity-matched cohort, matched prospective study
Relacionados45
ResumenMatched Cox proportional hazards is a survival analysis method that extends the Cox regression model to appropriately handle data arising from matched study designs — matched cohorts or matched case-control studies with time-to-event outcomes. By stratifying the partial likelihood by matched set, the method eliminates confounding from matching factors without estimating their baseline hazard, yielding valid hazard ratio estimates that are free from matching-induced bias.A matched cohort study is an observational design in which each exposed participant is paired with one or more unexposed counterparts who share key characteristics — such as age, sex, or comorbidity status — before both groups are followed forward in time to compare incident outcomes. Matching controls for measured confounders at the design stage, reducing bias that would otherwise require statistical adjustment alone.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Matched Cox Proportional Hazards · Matched Cohort Study. Recuperado el 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare