ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Ponderación por Puntuación de Propensión Aumentada por Aprendizaje Automático×Ponderación por Puntuación de Propensión (PSW / IPW)×
CampoInferencia causalInferencia causal
FamiliaRegression modelRegression model
Año de origen2010–20181983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Autor originalLee, Lessler & Stuart (2010); Chernozhukov et al. (2018, DML framework)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TipoCausal inference / semiparametric weightingCausal inference / reweighting
Fuente seminalChernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
AliasML-PSW, ML-augmented IPW, machine learning propensity weighting, nonparametric propensity score weightingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Relacionados56
ResumenMachine learning-augmented propensity score weighting (ML-PSW) replaces logistic regression with flexible ML algorithms — such as gradient boosting, LASSO, or random forests — to estimate the propensity score, then uses inverse probability weights to balance treated and control groups. This reduces model-misspecification bias when the true relationship between covariates and treatment assignment is complex or high-dimensional.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Machine learning-augmented propensity score weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare