ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Estimador de Concordancia Aumentado por Aprendizaje Automático×Emparejamiento por Puntuación de Propensión×
CampoInferencia causalEstadística para la investigación
FamiliaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Año de origen2006–20181983
Autor originalAbadie & Imbens (classical matching); Chernozhukov et al. (ML augmentation framework)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TipoCausal inference / nonparametric matchingMethod
Fuente seminalChernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
AliasML-augmented matching, ML matching estimator, high-dimensional matching estimator, data-adaptive matching estimatorPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Relacionados53
ResumenThe machine learning-augmented matching estimator combines classical nearest-neighbor or propensity-score matching with ML algorithms — such as lasso, random forests, or gradient boosting — to select covariates, estimate propensity scores, and correct for residual bias. The result is a matching-based causal estimator that remains valid under high-dimensional confounding where traditional hand-specified matching fails.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Machine Learning-Augmented Matching Estimator · Propensity Score Matching. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare