ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Método de Entrevista en Profundidad×Reflexividad en la Investigación Cualitativa×
CampoInvestigación cualitativaInvestigación cualitativa
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origen19541990
Autor originalCarl Rogers and Herbert H. HymanAnthony Giddens and Pierre Bourdieu
TipoMethodConcept
Fuente seminalKvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0761908631Finlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. DOI ↗
AliasIDI, qualitative interview, one-on-one interview, in-depth interviewingreflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practice
Relacionados54
ResumenIn-depth interviews are a qualitative research method in which a trained interviewer conducts one-on-one conversations with individual participants using open-ended questions to explore their experiences, perspectives, and understandings of a phenomenon. Developed in the 1950s by Rogers and Hyman, the method varies along a spectrum from structured (standardized question sets) to semi-structured (guided topic areas with flexibility) to unstructured (emergent, conversational). In-depth interviews are widely used in sociology, psychology, health sciences, anthropology, and organizational research to capture rich, detailed narratives and personal meaning.Reflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 4 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: In-Depth Interview Method · Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. Recuperado el 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare