ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Prueba HKA×Teoría coalescente×Estadísticas F (FST)×Test de McDonald-Kreitman×Barrido de selección (D de Tajima)×
CampoGenéticaGenéticaGenéticaGenéticaGenética
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origen19871982195119911989
Autor originalRichard Hudson, Martin Kreitman & Montserrat AguadeJohn KingmanSewall WrightJames McDonald & Martin KreitmanFumio Tajima
TipoStatistical testStochastic process modelPopulation differentiation measureHypothesis testNeutrality test
Fuente seminalHudson, R. R., Kreitman, M., & Aguadé, M. (1987). A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics, 116(1), 153–159. DOI ↗Kingman, J. F. C. (1982). The coalescent. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 13(3), 235–248. DOI ↗Wright, S. (1951). The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics, 15(4), 323–354. DOI ↗McDonald, J. H., & Kreitman, M. (1991). Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature, 351(6328), 652–654. DOI ↗Tajima, F. (1989). Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics, 123(3), 585–595. DOI ↗
AliasHKA test, Polymorphism divergence testKingman Coalescent, n-coalescentFST, Wright's F-statistics, Population differentiation indexMK test, Positive selection testTajima's D test, Selective sweep analysis, Neutrality test
Relacionados44444
ResumenThe Hudson-Kreitman-Aguade (HKA) test is a statistical method that tests for neutral evolution by comparing levels of within-population polymorphism and between-population divergence at multiple loci. Developed by Hudson, Kreitman, and Aguade in 1987, this test uses the principle that neutral loci should show expected relationships between polymorphism and divergence. Loci deviating from these relationships are candidates for selection. The HKA test is particularly useful for detecting selection in genome-wide surveys because it uses relative comparisons across loci rather than requiring external calibration.Coalescent theory is a probabilistic framework that traces the genealogical history of DNA sequences backward in time to their most recent common ancestor. Developed by John Kingman in 1982, this method forms the foundation of modern population genetics, enabling researchers to understand demographic events, estimate genetic parameters, and reconstruct evolutionary histories from modern genetic data.F-statistics are a family of measures developed by Sewall Wright to quantify population genetic structure and the degree of genetic differentiation between populations. FST, the most widely used F-statistic, measures the proportion of total genetic variation attributable to differences between populations versus within populations. FST ranges from zero (no differentiation) to one (complete differentiation). These statistics have become fundamental tools for understanding population structure, detecting population admixture, and analyzing the evolutionary forces shaping genetic variation.The McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test is a statistical method for detecting adaptive evolution by comparing ratios of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions within and between species. Developed by James McDonald and Martin Kreitman in 1991, this test exploits the key insight that neutral mutations accumulate at similar rates within and between species, while adaptive (nonsynonymous) substitutions should be enriched between species if they have been fixed by positive selection. The MK test has become a standard tool in molecular evolutionary biology for identifying genes under natural selection.Tajima's D is a statistical test designed to detect selective sweeps—recent, rapid fixation of advantageous mutations—from patterns of genetic variation in DNA sequences. Developed by Fumio Tajima in 1989, this test measures deviations from neutrality by comparing different measures of DNA sequence diversity. A significant Tajima's D value indicates departure from neutral evolution, suggesting positive selection, population structure, or demographic events.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: HKA Test · Coalescent Theory · F-statistics (FST) · McDonald-Kreitman Test · Selection Sweep (Tajima's D). Recuperado el 2026-06-20 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare