Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Investigación mediante grupos focales× | Técnica del Grupo Nominal× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Cualitativa | Cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990s | 1971 |
| Autor original≠ | Robert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. Krueger | André L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de Ven |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative data collection method | Qualitative research method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244 | Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗ |
| Alias | focus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup Araştırması | NGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group method |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | Focus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting. | The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|