ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Análisis de Documentos en el Campo×Investigación de Estudio de Caso×Análisis de contenido×Análisis de documentos×
CampoCualitativaCualitativaCualitativaInvestigación cualitativa
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origen1970s–1980s (codified in qualitative research methodology)1984 (seminal codification)Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 20181920
Autor originalRooted in ethnographic fieldwork traditions; systematised in qualitative education research by Bogdan & Biklen and Hammersley & AtkinsonRobert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984)Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications researchMax Weber and Karl Mannheim
TipoQualitative research strategyQualitative research designQualitative / mixed-method research techniqueMethod
Fuente seminalBogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods (5th ed.). Pearson. ISBN: 978-0205483655Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419
AliasFBDA, field document analysis, naturalistic document analysis, ethnographic document analysisVaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodologyİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysisdocumentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research
Relacionados6554
ResumenField-based document analysis is a qualitative strategy in which the researcher enters a real-world setting — a school, clinic, organisation, or community — and systematically collects, authenticates, and analyses documents that are naturally produced and used there. Unlike library-based or archival document analysis, the field context is integral: the researcher observes how documents function in practice, who produces and reads them, and what organisational or cultural work they perform. The approach is widely used in ethnographic, case-study, and institutional research.Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Field-based Document Analysis · Case Study · Content Analysis · Document Analysis. Recuperado el 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare