Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Autoetnografía Digital× | Autoetnografía× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Cualitativa | Cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 2000s–2010s | Late 20th century (term coined 1979; method consolidated 1990s–2000s) |
| Autor original≠ | Annette Markham; expanded through netnography work by Robert Kozinets | Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner, Norman Denzin (prominent theorists); David Hayano coined the term in 1979 |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative self-reflexive design | Qualitative research method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Markham, A. N. (2013). Undermining 'data': A critical examination of a core term in scientific inquiry. First Monday, 18(10). link ↗ | Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759100947 |
| Alias | online autoethnography, virtual autoethnography, digital self-ethnography, networked autoethnography | auto-ethnography, AE, personal narrative research, self-ethnography |
| Relacionados≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | Digital autoethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher systematically examines their own lived experience within digital environments — social media platforms, online communities, gaming worlds, digital workplaces, or other networked spaces — to illuminate broader cultural and social phenomena. Combining autoethnography's first-person reflexivity with the study of digital life, it treats personal digital traces, interactions, and self-representations as primary data. | Autoethnography is a qualitative research method in which the researcher uses systematic self-reflection and personal narrative to examine their own experiences within a cultural, social, or organizational context. By treating the self as both subject and instrument, autoethnography connects individual lived experience to broader cultural patterns, making personal stories analytically and socially significant. It bridges autobiography and ethnography, producing accounts that are simultaneously evocative and scholarly. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|