Comparar métodos

	Método Delphi	Evaluación de Razón Aditiva	AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation)
Campo	Toma de decisiones	Toma de decisiones	Toma de decisiones
Familia	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Año de origen	1963	2010	2022
Autor original	Dalkey, N., Helmer, O.	Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.	Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
Tipo	Weight_Subjective (expert consensus, iterative Likert/ranking)	Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)	Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Fuente seminal	Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science	Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy	Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering
Alias	—	—	—
Relacionados	8	8	8
Resumen	DELPHI (Delphi Method — iterative expert consensus for criterion importance elicitation) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. in 1963. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.