Comparar métodos

	Análisis Curricular	Evaluación de Programas
Campo	Métodos de campo	Métodos de campo
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	1949 (Tyler); 1980s–2000s (Posner's analytic framework)	1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)
Autor original	George J. Posner (systematic framework); Ralph Tyler (foundational rationale)	Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi
Tipo	Qualitative / mixed document analysis	Applied evaluation methodology
Fuente seminal	Posner, G. J. (2004). Analyzing the Curriculum (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0072823899	Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944
Alias	curriculum evaluation, curriculum review, syllabus analysis, curriculum appraisal	evaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation
Relacionados	6	3
Resumen	Curriculum analysis is a systematic research method for examining the content, structure, goals, and underlying assumptions of educational curricula — including written syllabi, textbooks, lesson plans, and policy documents. By mapping what is taught, how it is sequenced, and what values are embedded, researchers and educators can evaluate alignment with learning objectives, identify gaps or biases, and guide curriculum reform across all levels of education.	Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.