Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Análisis de Coste-Efectividad en Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (ETS)× | Cuadro de Mando Integral en Atención Sanitaria× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Gestión sanitaria | Gestión sanitaria |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1996 | 1992 |
| Autor original≠ | Diane Meade Drummond, Michael Gold | Robert Kaplan, David Norton |
| Tipo≠ | Economic evaluation methodology | Strategic planning and management framework |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (Eds.). (1996). Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195108231 | Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | CEA, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Healthcare | Healthcare BSC, Balanced Scorecard Healthcare |
| Relacionados | 5 | 5 |
| Resumen≠ | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) is an economic evaluation method that compares the cost and health benefits of alternative treatments to determine whether an intervention provides good value for money. Within Health Technology Assessment, CEA is the primary tool for recommending reimbursement and coverage decisions. | The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic performance management framework that translates an organization's mission and strategy into a comprehensive set of performance measures across four perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth. Developed by Kaplan and Norton in 1992 for general business, it has been extensively adapted for healthcare organizations to align hospital operations with strategic objectives. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|