Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Validez de constructo× | Validez Convergente× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Psicometría | Psicometría |
| Familia | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Año de origen≠ | 1955 | 1959 |
| Autor original≠ | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| Tipo≠ | Validity evaluation framework | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|