Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Análisis de Ítems de Pruebas Adaptativas Computarizadas× | Análisis de fiabilidad de pruebas adaptativas computarizadas× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Psicometría | Psicometría |
| Familia | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Año de origen≠ | 1970s–1990s | 1970s–1980s |
| Autor original≠ | Lord, Weiss, and colleagues in psychometric research on adaptive testing | David J. Weiss and IRT psychometricians |
| Tipo≠ | Item calibration and evaluation | Reliability estimation under adaptive testing |
| Fuente seminal≠ | van der Linden, W. J. & Glas, C. A. W. (Eds.) (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN: 978-0792365556 | Weiss, D. J. (1984). Application of computerized adaptive testing to educational problems. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(4), 361–375. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | CAT item analysis, adaptive item calibration, IRT-based CAT item evaluation, adaptive item parameter estimation | CAT reliability, adaptive test reliability, IRT-based reliability estimation, marginal reliability in CAT |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | Computerized adaptive test item analysis evaluates and calibrates items intended for use in adaptive testing environments. Unlike fixed-form analysis, it accounts for the non-random item exposure inherent in adaptive administration, using item response theory to estimate item parameters, information functions, and exposure rates across the ability continuum. | CAT reliability analysis quantifies measurement precision in computerized adaptive tests where each examinee receives a unique, individually tailored subset of items. Rather than a single classical coefficient, it uses item response theory to express precision as conditional standard error of measurement at each ability level, and marginal reliability as a global summary across the ability distribution. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|