Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Validez de contenido en pruebas adaptativas computarizadas (CAT)× | Validez de constructo× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Psicometría | Psicometría |
| Familia | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Año de origen≠ | 1975 / 1980 | 1955 |
| Autor original≠ | Lawshe (content validity); Lord & Weiss (CAT framework) | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Tipo≠ | Validity evaluation / test design | Validity evaluation framework |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | CAT content validity, adaptive item bank content coverage, content balancing in CAT, CAT blueprint validity | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | Content validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) ensures that an adaptively administered assessment adequately samples the intended content domain despite delivering only a subset of items to each examinee. It integrates classical content validity methods with CAT-specific item bank design and content balancing algorithms to guarantee representative domain coverage at both the item bank and the individual test level. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|