Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Prueba de Causalidad Bayesiana Toda-Yamamoto× | Prueba de causalidad de Granger× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Econometría | Econometría |
| Familia | Regression model | Regression model |
| Año de origen≠ | 1995 (base); Bayesian variant developed post-2000 | 1969 |
| Autor original≠ | Toda & Yamamoto (1995) for the frequentist base; Bayesian extension by subsequent applied econometricians | Clive W. J. Granger |
| Tipo≠ | Causality test / VAR-based inference | Time-series predictive causality test |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250. DOI ↗ | Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | Bayesian TY causality, Bayesian modified Wald causality, Bayesian Granger non-causality in VAR, BTY causality | Granger causality test, Granger non-causality test, predictive causality test, Granger Nedensellik Testi |
| Relacionados≠ | 3 | 5 |
| Resumen≠ | The Bayesian Toda-Yamamoto causality procedure combines the Toda-Yamamoto VAR augmentation strategy — which sidesteps the need for pre-testing integration and cointegration — with Bayesian prior-posterior updating. It tests Granger non-causality between time series that may be integrated or cointegrated without requiring differencing or error-correction modeling, while incorporating prior information and producing full posterior distributions over the causal parameters. | The Granger causality test, introduced by Clive W. J. Granger in 1969, assesses whether the past values of one time series help predict another beyond what the latter's own past already explains. It defines causality in a strictly predictive sense rather than as a structural or physical cause. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|