Apparent Total Tract Digestibility
Apparent Total Tract Digestibility Measurement · Also known as: ATTD, digestibility coefficient, fecal digestibility
Apparent Total Tract Digestibility (ATTD) is a measure of the proportion of a nutrient consumed in feed that is absorbed by the animal, calculated from the difference between dietary intake and fecal excretion. Standardized since the 1970s, ATTD is essential for quantifying the bioavailability of nutrients in feedstuffs, formulating balanced diets, and comparing the nutritive value of different feed ingredients across diverse animal species.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
ATTD is determined for novel feed ingredients being considered for commercial use, for comparing ingredient quality from different suppliers, and for formulating species-specific diets. It is particularly important for non-conventional feedstuffs (agricultural by-products, insect proteins, synthetic nutrients) where digestibility cannot be assumed. ATTD is also used in research studies evaluating factors affecting nutrient bioavailability (feed processing, feed additives, animal age).
Strengths & limitations
- Direct measurement of nutrient absorption; objective and reproducible when conducted with standardized protocols
- Applicable across all animal species and feed types with minimal specialized equipment
- Integrates effects of feed composition, antinutritional factors, and animal-related factors affecting digestion
- Results (digestibility coefficients) are directly applicable to diet formulation software and feeding standards
- Cost-reasonable compared to some alternative bioavailability methods
- Resource-intensive: requires housing, precise feed measurement, complete fecal collection, and chemical analysis over extended periods
- Confounded by endogenous fecal losses; true digestibility is higher than apparent digestibility and varies with nutrient intake level
- Individual animal variation; results from a small number of animals may not represent population averages
- Feed and fecal interactions during collection and storage can affect analytical results
- Does not account for nutrient bioavailability; digestible nutrient may not be fully absorbed (true absorption requires additional methodologies)
Frequently asked
Why is ATTD lower than true digestibility?
Apparent digestibility includes endogenous fecal losses (intestinal epithelial cells, bile, enzymes, microbial residues) that originated from the animal, not the diet. True digestibility corrects for these endogenous losses, resulting in higher values. Endogenous losses are relatively constant and proportional to nutrient intake, making them more apparent at lower dietary levels.
Does ATTD vary between animals?
Yes, individual animals show variation in ATTD due to differences in gut microbiota, intestinal surface area, nutrient absorption capacity, and metabolic efficiency. This is why digestibility studies typically use multiple animals (minimum 4-6) per treatment to estimate population averages. Genetic selection for improved digestibility efficiency is possible but slow.
Can ATTD be predicted without conducting full balance studies?
Partially. Regression equations developed from published digestibility data can predict ATTD from feed chemical composition (e.g., crude fiber, neutral detergent fiber content). However, these predictions are feed-type-specific and less accurate than measured values. Novel feeds or those with unusual composition should be measured directly.
How does processing affect ATTD?
Feed processing (grinding, pelleting, extrusion, heat treatment) often increases ATTD by disrupting physical barriers and improving access to nutrients. However, excessive processing or heat can damage nutrients (proteins, vitamins) and paradoxically reduce ATTD. The optimal processing depends on feed composition and animal species.
Sources
- Adeola, O. (2001). Digestion and balance techniques in pigs. In A. J. Lewis & L. L. Southern (Eds.), Swine Nutrition (2nd ed., pp. 903-916). CRC Press. link ↗
- Zijlstra, R. T., & Beltranena, E. (2013). Swine convert co-products from food and biofuel industries efficiently to protein for human food. Journal of Animal Science, 91(5), 2286-2296. DOI: 10.2527/af.2013-0014 ↗
- National Research Council (2012). Nutrient Requirements of Swine (11th ed.). National Academies Press. link ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Apparent Total Tract Digestibility Measurement. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/veterinary-science/apparent-total-tract-digestibility
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- NDF/ADF AnalysisVeterinary Science↔ compare
- Rumen In Vitro Gas ProductionVeterinary Science↔ compare
- Somatic Cell CountVeterinary Science↔ compare