ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelineResilience frameworks / composite resilience indices

Urban Resilience Assessment

Urban resilience assessment evaluates how well a city can absorb, adapt to, and recover from shocks such as floods, earthquakes and pandemics and from chronic stresses such as poverty and ageing infrastructure. Most assessments are framework-driven composite indices: they define resilience dimensions — infrastructural, social, economic, ecological and institutional — gather indicators for each, normalise and weight them, and aggregate to a resilience score or profile. Because, as Meerow, Newell and Stults documented, 'urban resilience' is defined in conflicting ways across the literature, every assessment must first take a position on what resilience means, for whom, and against which disturbances.

Open in MethodMindSoonApply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore
VideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Sources

  1. Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Urban Resilience Assessment (Frameworks and Indices for City Resilience to Shocks and Stresses). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/urban-studies/urban-resilience-assessment

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

Referenced by

ScholarGateUrban Resilience Assessment (Urban Resilience Assessment (Frameworks and Indices for City Resilience to Shocks and Stresses)). Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/urban-studies/urban-resilience-assessment · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026