Disaster Recovery Curve Analysis
Disaster recovery curve analysis represents the recovery of a community or system after a disaster as a trajectory of functionality over time and uses that trajectory to quantify resilience. Building on the resilience-triangle concept and formalized for community recovery by Scott Miles and Stephanie Chang in 2006, the approach tracks a performance indicator — population, employment, housing occupancy, service capacity, or composite functionality — from its pre-event baseline, through the abrupt drop caused by the disaster, along the path back toward (or beyond) the baseline. From the curve, analysts read the magnitude of the initial loss, the speed and shape of recovery, the time to return, and the cumulative resilience loss represented by the area between the baseline and the recovery path. Comparing curves across communities or scenarios reveals what drives faster, fuller recovery and complements loss-estimation models that stop at the moment of impact.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Miles, S. B., & Chang, S. E. (2006). Modeling Community Recovery from Earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), 439-458. DOI: 10.1193/1.2192847 ↗
- Cutter, S. L., Ash, K. D., & Emrich, C. T. (2014). The geographies of community disaster resilience. Global Environmental Change, 29, 65-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Disaster Recovery Curve (Resilience Trajectory) Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/disaster-studies/disaster-recovery-curve-analysis
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Baseline Resilience Indicators for CommunitiesDisaster Studies↔ compare
- Build Back Better Recovery EvaluationDisaster Studies↔ compare
- Post-Disaster Needs AssessmentDisaster Studies↔ compare